On-Farm Network Research Reports

The On-Farm Network is growing, and so is access to trial results!  Single-site research reports have been organized in the database below, providing detailed information at the farm level, packaged in an easy-to-read single page document.

How it works:

Limit the number of reports by clicking the desired Crop, Year, Trial Type, and/or Major Region.  Within the database table, click on any column header to sort the table.  To view a single site report, select the Trial ID to open the single site research report in a new tab.

Important information:

There are two statistical tests that are used to analyze On-Farm Network data:

  • A paired t-test is used for trials with two treatments (eg. Treated vs. untreated).
  • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used for trials with three or more treatments (eg. Product A vs. Product B vs. Untreated).

Confidence level: A 95% confidence level is used within our trials.  This means we can say with 95% certainty that we are certain of the outcome.

P-value: A calculated probability used in statistics to either accept or reject the null hypothesis.   The null hypothesis for our trials is that there is no difference between treatment means.  A p-value of less than 0.05 suggests that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, meaning there is a significant difference between treatment means.  If the p-value is greater than 0.05, then there is not enough evidence to conclude that the observed treatment differences are due to our applied treatment at a 95% confidence level.

A trial with a significant yield difference is highlighted green in the yield difference column of the database.

Coefficient of Variation (CV): The statistical measure of random variation in a trial.  The lower the value, the less variable the data.

A trial that does not meet the trial requirements, eg. field history, is not included in the overall average for yield difference.

MPSG does not endorse the use of products tested in the On-Farm Network.  Although trials are conducted at multiple sites under varying conditions, your individual results may vary.  Contents of these research publications can only be reproduced with the permission of MPSG.

 

Crop

Year

Trial Type

Major Region

NOTE: To view all columns, scroll left to right

Year Region Municipality Crop Trial Type Trial Detail Yield +/- Unit Trial ID
2019 Central Morris Soybean Seed Treatment EverGol Energy vs. Untreated 1.9 bu/ac 2019-SST03
2019 Central Brokenhead Soybean Single Inoculant Seed Applied Inoculant vs. Untreated -0.7 bu/ac 2019-S1IN02
2019 Central Westlake-Gladstone Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP07
2019 Central Portage la Prairie Dry Bean Foliar Fungicide Lance AG vs. Untreated 50 lbs/ac 2019-DBF02
2019 Southwest Two Borders Soybean Foliar Fungicide Cotegra vs. Untreated -1.1 bu/ac 2019-SF04
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Seed Treatment Evergol, 1x Evergol Energy + Stress Shield, 1x Evergol Energy + Stress Shield + Headsup bu/ac 2019-SST02
2019 Northwest Livingston Pea Foliar Fungicide Cotegra vs. Untreated 1.3 bu/ac 2019-PF08
2019 Central De Salaberry Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP06
2019 Central Montcalm Dry Bean Foliar Fungicide Cotegra vs. Untreated 6 lbs/ac 2019-DBF01
2019 Southwest Prairie Lakes Soybean Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated -0.37 bu/ac 2019-SF03
2019 Eastern Tache Soybean Row Spacing 15" vs 30" 0.3 bu/ac 2019-SRS09
2019 Northwest Swan Valley West Pea Foliar Fungicide Dyax vs. Untreated 2.3 bu/ac 2019-PF07
2019 Central De Salaberry Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP05
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated 0.7 bu/ac 2019-SF02
2019 Central Roland Soybean Row Spacing 7.5" vs 15" 1.6 bu/ac 2019-SRS08
2019 Southwest Two Borders Pea Foliar Fungicide Delaro x2 vs. Delaro x 1 4 bu/ac 2019-PF05
2019 Central Grey Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP04
2019 Interlake St. Andrews Soybean Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated 1.2 bu/ac 2019-SF01
2019 Eastern De Salaberry Soybean Row Spacing 15" vs 30" 1.9 bu/ac 2019-SRS06
2019 Southwest Elton Pea Foliar Fungicide Headline EC vs Untreated 1.3 bu/ac 2019-PF04
2019 Central Morris Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP03
2019 Eastern Brokenhead Soybean Biologicals Crop Aid Soil vs Untreated -1.7 bu/ac 2019-SB01
2019 Central Morris Soybean Row Spacing 15" vs 30" -0.4 bu/ac 2019-SRS05
2019 Central Louise Pea Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated 0.48 bu/ac 2019-PF03
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP02
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Biologicals Active Flower® vs Untreated -0.4 bu/ac 2019-SB02
2019 Central Louise Soybean Row Spacing 7.5" vs 15" -0.97 bu/ac 2019-SRS04
2019 Interlake Rockwood Pea Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated 3.2 bu/ac 2019-PF02
2019 Eastern Brokenhead Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP01
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Seed Treatment EverGol Energy + Stress Shield vs. Untreated 0.1 bu/ac 2019-SST07
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Double Inoculant Seed Applied vs. Seed Applied + In-furrow Inoculant -0.9 bu/ac 2019-S2IN04
2019 Interlake Bifrost-Riverton Soybean Row Spacing 10" vs 20" 0.3 bu/ac 2019-SRS03
2019 Central Rhineland Pea Foliar Fungicide Delaro vs. Untreated 1.4 bu/ac 2019-PF01
2019 Interlake Bifrost-Riverton Soybean Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated 0.0 bu/ac 2019-SF09
2019 Central Westlake-Gladstone Soybean Seed Treatment Cruiser Maxx Vibrance Beans vs. Untreated -0.5 bu/ac 2019-SST06
2019 Northwest Dauphin Soybean Double Inoculant Seed Applied vs. Seed Applied + In-furrow Inoculant -0.4 bu/ac 2019-S2IN03
2019 Interlake St. Andrews Soybean Row Spacing 15" vs 30" 0.0 bu/ac 2019-SRS02
2019 Central Rhineland Dry Bean Fertility 0lbs vs 40lbs vs 70lbs vs 140lbs N lbs/ac 2019-DBN03
2019 Interlake Bifrost-Riverton Soybean Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated -0.4 bu/ac 2019-SF08
2019 Eastern De Salaberry Soybean Seed Treatment EverGol Energy vs. Untreated 0.0 bu/ac 2019-SST05
2019 Southwest Grassland Soybean Double Inoculant Seed Applied vs. Seed Applied + In-furrow Inoculant 0.0 bu/ac 2019-S2IN02
2019 Eastern Springfield Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP10
2019 Central Norfolk Treherne Dry Bean Fertility 0lbs vs 70lbs vs 140lbs N lbs/ac 2019-DBN01
2019 Eastern Brokenhead Soybean Foliar Fungicide Priaxor vs. Untreated 0.8 bu/ac 2019-SF07
2019 Central Morris Soybean Seed Treatment Cruiser Maxx Vibrance Beans vs. Untreated 1.2 bu/ac 2019-SST04
2019 Eastern Lac du Bonnet Soybean Single Inoculant Seed Applied Inoculant vs. Untreated 0.1 bu/ac 2019-S1IN05
2019 Eastern Hanover Soybean Population 190K vs 160K vs 130K bu/ac 2019-SP09
2019 Central Rhineland Dry Bean Single Inoculant BOS Peat Inoculant vs Untreated 2 lbs/ac 2019-DBI01
2019 Central Morris Soybean Foliar Fungicide Cotegra vs. Untreated 0.0 bu/ac 2019-SF06
2018 Central Louise Soybean Double Inoculant Seed Applied vs. Seed Applied + In-furrow Inoculant -0.1 bu/ac 2018-S2In03